Skip to main content

Stalin on the “Cult of Personality”

There are numerous narratives arguing that Stalin was fond of personality. But the fact is that Stalin was critical of "the cult of personality". Those western facts are totally baseless.

Stalin's letters and speeches are good examples to debunk the lies.


Joseph Stalin speaking on the radio


J.V. Stalin – Speech Delivered at the First All-Union Congress of Collective Farm Shock Brigadiers


”Finally, a few words about the letter written by the collective farmers of Bezenchuk. This letter has been published, and you must have read it. It is unquestionably a good letter. It shows that among our collective farmers there are not a few experienced and intelligent organisers and agitators in the cause of collective farming, who are the pride of our country. But this letter contains one incorrect passage with which we cannot possibly agree. The point is that the Bezenchuk comrades describe their work in the collective farm as modest and all but insignificant work, whereas they describe the efforts of orators and leaders, who sometimes make speeches of inordinate length, as great and creative work. Can we agree with that? No, comrades, we cannot possibly agree with it. The Bezenchuk comrades have made a mistake here. Perhaps they made the mistake out of modesty. But the mistake does not cease to be a mistake for all that. The times have passed when leaders were regarded as the only makers of history, while the workers and peasants were not taken into account. The destinies of nations and of states are now determined, not only by leaders, but primarily and mainly by the vast masses of the working people. The workers and the peasants, who without fuss and noise are building factories and mills, constructing mines and railways, building collective farms and state farms, creating all the values of life, feeding and clothing the whole world, they are the real heroes and the creators of the new life. Apparently, our Bezenchuk comrades have forgotten this. It is not good when people overrate their strength and begin to be conceited about the services they have rendered. That leads to boasting, and boasting is not a good thing. But it is still worse when people begin to underrate their strength and fail to see that their “modest” and “insignificant” work is really great and creative work that decides the fate of history.

I would like the Bezenchuk comrades to approve this slight amendment of mine to their letter.”

 

J.V. Stalin – Letter on Publications for Children Directed to the Central Committee of the All Union Communist Youth


“I am absolutely against the publication of “Stories of the childhood of Stalin.”

The book abounds with a mass of inexactitudes of fact, of alterations, of exaggerations and of unmerited praise. Some amateur writers, scribblers, (perhaps honest scribblers) and some adulators have led the author astray. It is a shame for the author, but a fact remains a fact.

But this is not the important thing. The important thing resides in the fact that the book has a tendency to engrave on the minds of Soviet children (and people in general) the personality cult of leaders, of infallible heroes. This is dangerous and detrimental.

The theory of “heroes” and the “crowd” is not a Bolshevik, but a Social-Revolutionary theory. The heroes make the people, transform them from a crowd into people, thus say the Social-Revolutionaries.

The people make the heroes, thus reply the Bolsheviks to the Social-Revolutionaries. The book carries water to the windmill of the Social-Revolutionaries. No matter which book it is that brings the water to the windmill of the Social-Revolutionaries, this book is going to drown in our common, Bolshevik cause.

I suggest we burn this book.” 


J.V. – Stalin Address Delivered in the Kremlin Palace to the Graduates From the Red Army Academies.


”there is too much talk about the services rendered by chiefs, by leaders. They are credited with all, or nearly all, of our achievements. That, of course, is wrong, it is incorrect. It is not merely a matter of leaders . . . we must first of all learn to value people, to value cadres, to value every worker capable of benefiting our common cause. It is time to realize that of all the valuable capital the world possesses, the most valuable and most decisive is people, cadres . . . cadres decide everything” 


An unpublished Speech by Stalin at the Plenum of the Central Committee, CPSU October 16, 1952.


”MOLOTOV (. . . stated that he is and will always he a faithful disciple of Stalin.)

STALIN (interrupting Molotov): This is nonsense. I have no students at all. We are all students of the great Lenin.” 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Karl Marx: On The Great Indian Revolt of 1857

Marx's observations on the Revolt of 1857 are a distinctive component to the study of modern Indian history. Marx was almost the very first to grasp the true nature of the revolt. Karl Marx wrote 31 articles about the 1857 Indian revolt from July to Oct 1857 for the American newspaper 'New York Daily Tribune (NYDT)’. Although the British called it a mutiny/uprising, Marx called 1857 'a national revolt' . When Marx began writing articles about India in the New York Times in 1853, he saw the British as India's saviours. He regarded British colonialism as a necessary evil to break Asia's sluggish economy by investing in the forces required for capitalist expansion. Marx characterized British colonization in India as the "Double Mission of the British". In the puberty, they were contributing positively by breaking down India's Asiatic mode of production, which was hampering its path to capitalism. Second, they were rejuvenating the economy in order t...

KARL MARX'S VIEW ON RELIGION AND HOW IT IS MISINTERPRETED

In this article we will discuss what Marx's stance and view on religion was and how some one his most popular quotes on religion have been heavily misinterpreted over time. WHAT WAS MARX'S VIEW ON RELIGION?  Marx makes a structural-functionalist argument about religion or more specifically organized religion. Now you will thought of what actually the structural theory is? Structuration Theory  is a concept in sociology that offers perspectives on human behavior based on a synthesis of structure(authoritative institutions) and agency(individual expression or will). Marx believed that religion had certain practical functions in society that were similar to the function of opium in a sick or injured person, it reduced people's immediate suffering and provided them with pleasant illusions which gave them the strength to carry on. Marx also saw religion as harmful to revolutionary potential in some cases as it can prevent people from seeing the class structure and oppression aro...