Skip to main content

TYPES OF CLASSES

What is Class?

A group of people sharing common relations to labor and the means of production.

BOURGEOISIE CLASS (CAPITALISTS)

The bourgeoisie is a social class that came to own the means of production during the epoch(beginning) of modern industrialization and whose societal concerns are the value of property and the preservation of capital to ensure the perpetuation of their economic supremacy in society.

PROLETARIAT CLASS (WORKING CLASS)

Proletariat class is the class of wage earners in an economic society whose only possession of significant material value is their labour power(How much work they can do).
The proletariat are oppressed by capitalism and the wage system. This oppression gives the proletariat common economic and political interests that transcended national boundaries.
These common interests put the proletariat in a position to unite and take power away from the capitalist class.

PETTY BOURGEOISIE (MIDDLE CLASS)

The term "Petty Bourgeoisie" to identify the socio-economic stratum of the bourgeoisie that compromised small scale capitalists such as shop keepers and workers who manage the production, distribution and/or exchange of commodities and/or services owned by bourgeoisie employers. Petty bourgeoisie are not as committed to the revolution as much as the proletariats.

LUMPEN PROLETARIAT CLASS (OUTCAST MOB)

According to Karl Marx, the Lumpen proletariat are the lowest level of the proletariats compromising of unemployables, vagrants and criminals. They are also characterised by a lack of class identification and solidarity hence they can be easily exploited by the Counter-revolutionaries and the fascists but later Mao Zedong argues that lumpen proletariat can be swayed into class consciousness and the revolution later with proper leadership.
• • •
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Karl Marx: On The Great Indian Revolt of 1857

Marx's observations on the Revolt of 1857 are a distinctive component to the study of modern Indian history. Marx was almost the very first to grasp the true nature of the revolt. Karl Marx wrote 31 articles about the 1857 Indian revolt from July to Oct 1857 for the American newspaper 'New York Daily Tribune (NYDT)’. Although the British called it a mutiny/uprising, Marx called 1857 'a national revolt' . When Marx began writing articles about India in the New York Times in 1853, he saw the British as India's saviours. He regarded British colonialism as a necessary evil to break Asia's sluggish economy by investing in the forces required for capitalist expansion. Marx characterized British colonization in India as the "Double Mission of the British". In the puberty, they were contributing positively by breaking down India's Asiatic mode of production, which was hampering its path to capitalism. Second, they were rejuvenating the economy in order t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Marx’s Theory of Alienation

Capitalist alienation is a Marxist notion that refers to individuals' estrangement or separation from their work, the output of their labour, and each other within the capitalist mode of production. This phenomena arises from capitalism's fundamental contradictions, which result in a system in which labour is commodified and employees are reduced to mere appendages of the means of production. Capitalist alienation happens when labour is converted into a commodity that can be bought and sold on the market just like any other commodity. As a result, the labour of the worker is separated from the product, and the worker is alienated from the outcome of their labour. Furthermore, workers are cut off from their own creative potential because their job is dictated by the necessities of the capitalist system rather than their own aspirations and interests. "The alienation of man thus appeared as the fundamental evil of capitalist society.”   ―   Karl Marx , Selected Writings in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Why can't I be a Trotskyist? My Disagreements with Trotsky

Ev en after Leon Trotsky and his theories passed away, a tiny minority still exists within the far-left society. These folks have been around since the beginning of the Russian Revolution and are referred to as "Trotskyists."  Leon Trotsky at his desk, 1919 These Trotskyists are the misinterpretations of Marxism's devoted supporters. They make an effort to undermine Marxist-Leninism by presenting a defective theory of revolution.  Even anti-Communists are spreading the notion that "The Soviet Union Would Have Survived If Trotsky Took Power." That is a wholly bogus narrative. So let's talk about why the "Permanent Revolution" thesis is so incorrect. And what is said about Marxism by this theory? TWO-STAGE THEORY OF REVOLUTION A complex theory that cannot be succinctly articulated in a few phrases, Permanent Revolution can mislead people's perceptions of what Trotsky was actually supporting.  The theory behind "Two-Stage Theory," or sta...
Post a Comment
Read more