Skip to main content

Marxist Stage Theory

Marx’s general ideas about society are known as his theory of historical materialism.

"Materialism simply means that it is matter or material reality, which is the basis for any change."

According to Marx’s theory of historical materialism, societies pass through six stages;

Primitive Communism → Slavery or Imperialism → Feudalism→ Capitalism →Socialism →Communism

Stage 1 - Primitive Communism

Men performed the same economic function - hunter gathering. They worked together in order to survive. There was no private property and there were no classes. Eventually the most successful hunter gatherers gained power and control over the others.

Stage 2 - Imperialism

The strong man ruled. He began by owning all the land but when threatened by outsiders, he would grant land to others in return for military services. A new land-owning aristocracy was therefore created.

Stage 3 - Feudalism

Land was owned by the aristocracy who exploited the peasantry who worked it. There was a surplus of food which the aristocracy sold to others - creating a class of merchants and capitalists who wanted to share political power.

Stage 4 - Capitalism

The wealthy merchants and factory owners (bourgeoisie) obtained political power and exploited the workers (proletariat). As the proletariat became politically aware they would rise up and overthrow the bourgeois government.

Stage 5 - Socialism

There would be a dictatorship of the proletariat as worker's organisations re-distributed food, goods and services fairly according to need, and profits were shared by all. Middle class would come to understand that equality was superior to private ownership.

Stage 6 - Communism

Everyone would join together for the common good. Money and government would no longer be needed and society would be class-less. As all countries reached this stage the world would become state less and competition and wars would cease.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Karl Marx: On The Great Indian Revolt of 1857

Marx's observations on the Revolt of 1857 are a distinctive component to the study of modern Indian history. Marx was almost the very first to grasp the true nature of the revolt. Karl Marx wrote 31 articles about the 1857 Indian revolt from July to Oct 1857 for the American newspaper 'New York Daily Tribune (NYDT)’. Although the British called it a mutiny/uprising, Marx called 1857 'a national revolt' . When Marx began writing articles about India in the New York Times in 1853, he saw the British as India's saviours. He regarded British colonialism as a necessary evil to break Asia's sluggish economy by investing in the forces required for capitalist expansion. Marx characterized British colonization in India as the "Double Mission of the British". In the puberty, they were contributing positively by breaking down India's Asiatic mode of production, which was hampering its path to capitalism. Second, they were rejuvenating the economy in order t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Stalin on the “Cult of Personality”

There are numerous narratives arguing that Stalin was fond of personality. But the fact is that Stalin was critical of "the cult of personality". Those western facts are totally baseless. Stalin's letters and speeches are good examples to debunk the lies. Joseph Stalin speaking on the radio J.V. Stalin – Speech Delivered at the First All-Union Congress of Collective Farm Shock Brigadiers ”Finally, a few words about the letter written by the collective farmers of Bezenchuk. This letter has been published, and you must have read it. It is unquestionably a good letter. It shows that among our collective farmers there are not a few experienced and intelligent organisers and agitators in the cause of collective farming, who are the pride of our country. But this letter contains one incorrect passage with which we cannot possibly agree. The point is that the Bezenchuk comrades describe their work in the collective farm as modest and all but insignificant work, whereas they desc...
Post a Comment
Read more

KARL MARX'S VIEW ON RELIGION AND HOW IT IS MISINTERPRETED

In this article we will discuss what Marx's stance and view on religion was and how some one his most popular quotes on religion have been heavily misinterpreted over time. WHAT WAS MARX'S VIEW ON RELIGION?  Marx makes a structural-functionalist argument about religion or more specifically organized religion. Now you will thought of what actually the structural theory is? Structuration Theory  is a concept in sociology that offers perspectives on human behavior based on a synthesis of structure(authoritative institutions) and agency(individual expression or will). Marx believed that religion had certain practical functions in society that were similar to the function of opium in a sick or injured person, it reduced people's immediate suffering and provided them with pleasant illusions which gave them the strength to carry on. Marx also saw religion as harmful to revolutionary potential in some cases as it can prevent people from seeing the class structure and oppression aro...
1 comment
Read more